Celeron 4205U vs Xeon X3430
Description
The 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.5 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.5 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
106e5
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Lynnfield
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
20.61k points
15.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.61k points
55.66k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4205U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
6.53k
6.41k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
9.46k
4.27k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
2.38k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
2.67k (x1.14)
TOTAL
20.61k
15.74k (x0.76)
Multithread
4205U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
12.97k
25.19k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
16.76k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
9.33k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
4.37k (x2)
TOTAL
37.61k
55.66k (x1.48)
Performance/W
4205U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
865 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
176 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289 points/W
98 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
146 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
2507 points/W
586 points/W
Performance/GHz
4205U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
3629 points/GHz
2288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
852 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1298 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
11451 points/GHz
5621 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4