Celeron 4205U vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 325.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 8.7 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 325.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 8.7 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306f2
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
20.61k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.61k points
452.9k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4205U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6.53k
11.08k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
9.46k
9.57k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
3.18k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
3.28k (x1.41)
TOTAL
20.61k
27.11k (x1.32)
Multithread
4205U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
12.97k
139.07k (x10.72)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
133.47k (x7.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
46.6k (x10.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
6.65k (x3.05)
TOTAL
37.61k
325.78k (x8.66)
Performance/W
4205U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
865 points/W
1159 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
1112 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
146 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
2507 points/W
2715 points/W
Performance/GHz
4205U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3629 points/GHz
3573 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
1027 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1298 points/GHz
1059 points/GHz
TOTAL
11451 points/GHz
8745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4