Celeron 4205U vs Pentium Gold 5405U
Description
Both models 4205U and 5405U are based on Whiskey Lake architecture.
Whiskey Lake is the third 14nm process-refinement and it’s a mobile architecture with a short list of U models.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the 5405U gets 48.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5405U is 1.3 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Whiskey Lake is the third 14nm process-refinement and it’s a mobile architecture with a short list of U models.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the 5405U gets 48.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5405U is 1.3 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
806eb
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
20.61k points
21.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.61k points
48.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4205U
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.53k
7.01k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
9.46k
9.51k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
2.31k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
2.52k (x1.08)
TOTAL
20.61k
21.34k (x1.04)
Multithread
4205U
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.97k
16.03k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
24.11k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
5.59k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
3.1k (x1.42)
TOTAL
37.61k
48.83k (x1.3)
Performance/W
4205U
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
865 points/W
1069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
1607 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289 points/W
372 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
146 points/W
207 points/W
TOTAL
2507 points/W
3255 points/W
Performance/GHz
4205U
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
3629 points/GHz
3046 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
4134 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
1004 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1298 points/GHz
1094 points/GHz
TOTAL
11451 points/GHz
9278 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4