Celeron 4205U vs Core 2 Duo E4400
Description
The 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the E4400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the E4400 gets 14.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4205U is 2.6 times faster than the E4400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the E4400 gets 14.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4205U is 2.6 times faster than the E4400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
6fd
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Allendale
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
20.61k points
7.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.61k points
14.17k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4205U
E4400
Test#1 (Integers)
6.53k
2.3k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
9.46k
2.09k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
2.1k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
1.18k (x0.51)
TOTAL
20.61k
7.67k (x0.37)
Multithread
4205U
E4400
Test#1 (Integers)
12.97k
4.61k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
4.17k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
4.2k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
1.2k (x0.55)
TOTAL
37.61k
14.17k (x0.38)
Performance/W
4205U
E4400
Test#1 (Integers)
865 points/W
71 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
64 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289 points/W
65 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
146 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
2507 points/W
218 points/W
Performance/GHz
4205U
E4400
Test#1 (Integers)
3629 points/GHz
1151 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
1044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
1048 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1298 points/GHz
591 points/GHz
TOTAL
11451 points/GHz
3834 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4