| | | | | | |

Celeron 4205U vs Core i5-4210U


Description
The 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the i5-4210U gets 45.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4210U is 1.2 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
40651
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
20.61k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.61k points
57.58k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4205U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.53k
9.26k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
9.46k
8.2k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
3.57k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
2.92k (x1.25)
TOTAL
20.61k
23.95k (x1.16)

Multithread

4205U

i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.97k
17.53k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
17.56k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
7.65k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
2.49k (x1.14)
TOTAL
37.61k
45.22k (x1.2)

Performance/W
4205U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
865 points/W
1169 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
1171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289 points/W
510 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
146 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
2507 points/W
3015 points/W

Performance/GHz
4205U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3629 points/GHz
3429 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
3038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
1322 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1298 points/GHz
1083 points/GHz
TOTAL
11451 points/GHz
8872 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4