Celeron 4205U vs Core i5-2410M
Description
The 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the i5-2410M gets 36.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4205U is 1 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the i5-2410M gets 36.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4205U is 1 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
206a7
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
20.61k points
20.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.61k points
38.68k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4205U
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.53k
7.98k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
9.46k
6.55k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
3.28k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
2.7k (x1.16)
TOTAL
20.61k
20.52k (x1)
Multithread
4205U
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
12.97k
13.66k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
13.17k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
7.05k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
3.02k (x1.38)
TOTAL
37.61k
36.9k (x0.98)
Performance/W
4205U
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
865 points/W
390 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
376 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289 points/W
202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
146 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
2507 points/W
1054 points/W
Performance/GHz
4205U
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
3629 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
2258 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
1132 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1298 points/GHz
933 points/GHz
TOTAL
11451 points/GHz
7075 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4