| | | | | | |

Celeron 3855U vs Xeon X3430


Description
The 3855U is based on Skylake architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.

Summarizing, the X3430 is 2.3 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
106e5
Core
Skylake-U
Lynnfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2096 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2015
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
19.24k points
15.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.56k points
55.66k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3855U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
1.64k
1.75k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
6.72k
3.95k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.06k
2.29k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
2.66k (x1.1)
TOTAL
12.83k
10.65k (x0.83)

Multithread

3855U

X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
2.2k
6.81k (x3.1)
Test#2 (FP)
9.59k
15.37k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
8.9k (x3.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.27k
4.42k (x1.95)
TOTAL
16.81k
35.49k (x2.11)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3855U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
5.93k
6.41k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
4.27k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
2.38k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
2.67k (x1.07)
TOTAL
19.24k
15.74k (x0.82)

Multithread

3855U

X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
25.19k (x3.2)
Test#2 (FP)
11.28k
16.76k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
9.33k (x3.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
4.37k (x1.75)
TOTAL
24.56k
55.66k (x2.27)

Performance/W
3855U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
524 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
752 points/W
176 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
194 points/W
98 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
1637 points/W
586 points/W

Performance/GHz
3855U
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
3706 points/GHz
2288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5333 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1423 points/GHz
852 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1562 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
12024 points/GHz
5621 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4