Celeron 3855U vs Pentium T3400
Description
The 3855U is based on Skylake architecture while the T3400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3855U is 1.7 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3855U is 1.7 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
6fd
Core
Skylake-U
Merom-2M
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.167 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
2096 kB
kB
Date
December 2015
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
19.24k points
8.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.56k points
14.91k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3855U
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.64k
1.86k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
6.72k
1.9k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.06k
1.42k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
0.84k (x0.35)
TOTAL
12.83k
6.01k (x0.47)
Multithread
3855U
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.2k
4.04k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
9.59k
4.17k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
3.55k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.27k
1.2k (x0.53)
TOTAL
16.81k
12.96k (x0.77)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3855U
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
5.93k
2.49k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
2.25k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
2.17k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
1.14k (x0.46)
TOTAL
19.24k
8.05k (x0.42)
Multithread
3855U
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
4.98k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
11.28k
4.43k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
4.27k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
1.23k (x0.49)
TOTAL
24.56k
14.91k (x0.61)
Performance/W
3855U
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
524 points/W
142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
752 points/W
127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
194 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
1637 points/W
426 points/W
Performance/GHz
3855U
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
3706 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5333 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1423 points/GHz
1002 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1562 points/GHz
526 points/GHz
TOTAL
12024 points/GHz
3714 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4