Celeron 3855U vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Description
The 3855U is based on Skylake architecture while the Q6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 1.2 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 1.2 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
6fb
Core
Skylake-U
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
2096 kB
kB
Date
December 2015
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
19.24k points
8.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.56k points
30.64k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3855U
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
5.93k
2.78k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
2.49k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
2.37k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
1.29k (x0.52)
TOTAL
19.24k
8.92k (x0.46)
Multithread
3855U
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
10.9k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
11.28k
9.79k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
9.11k (x3.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
0.84k (x0.34)
TOTAL
24.56k
30.64k (x1.25)
Performance/W
3855U
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
524 points/W
115 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
752 points/W
103 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
194 points/W
96 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
1637 points/W
323 points/W
Performance/GHz
3855U
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
3706 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5333 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1423 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1562 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
12024 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4