| | | | | | |

Celeron 3855U vs Core i5-3320M


Description
The 3855U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the i5-3320M gets 54.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 2.2 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2096 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2015
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
19.24k points
29.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.56k points
58.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3855U
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
1.64k
3.21k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
6.72k
9.05k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.06k
3.94k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
3.93k (x1.64)
TOTAL
12.83k
20.13k (x1.57)

Multithread

3855U

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.2k
6.08k (x2.77)
Test#2 (FP)
9.59k
19.02k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
8.85k (x3.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.27k
3.98k (x1.75)
TOTAL
16.81k
37.93k (x2.26)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3855U
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.93k
10.89k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
9.77k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
3.98k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
3.77k (x1.51)
TOTAL
19.24k
28.4k (x1.48)

Multithread

3855U

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
20.23k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
11.28k
20.83k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
9.49k (x3.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
4.04k (x1.62)
TOTAL
24.56k
54.6k (x2.22)

Performance/W
3855U
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
524 points/W
578 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
752 points/W
595 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
194 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
115 points/W
TOTAL
1637 points/W
1560 points/W

Performance/GHz
3855U
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3706 points/GHz
3300 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5333 points/GHz
2960 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1423 points/GHz
1205 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1562 points/GHz
1141 points/GHz
TOTAL
12024 points/GHz
8607 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4