Celeron 3855U vs N3060
Description
The 3855U is based on Skylake architecture while the N3060 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3855U is 1.8 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3855U is 1.8 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
406c4
Core
Skylake-U
Braswell
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
2096 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2015
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
19.24k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.56k points
13.36k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3855U
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
5.93k
4.68k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
2.74k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
1.83k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
0.9k (x0.36)
TOTAL
19.24k
10.15k (x0.53)
Multithread
3855U
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
6.31k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
11.28k
3.68k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
2.46k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
0.91k (x0.37)
TOTAL
24.56k
13.36k (x0.54)
Performance/W
3855U
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
524 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
752 points/W
614 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
194 points/W
410 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
1637 points/W
2227 points/W
Performance/GHz
3855U
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
3706 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5333 points/GHz
1104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1423 points/GHz
739 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1562 points/GHz
364 points/GHz
TOTAL
12024 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4