| | | | | | |

Celeron 3855U vs G1610T


Description
The 3855U is based on Skylake architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.6 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2096 kB
2048 kB
Date
December 2015
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
19.24k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.56k points
38.59k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3855U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.64k
2.34k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
6.72k
6.54k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.06k
3k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
2.74k (x1.14)
TOTAL
12.83k
14.62k (x1.14)

Multithread

3855U

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.2k
4.67k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
9.59k
12.66k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
5.95k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.27k
2.53k (x1.11)
TOTAL
16.81k
25.8k (x1.53)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3855U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.93k
7.87k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
7.14k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
3.04k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
2.79k (x1.11)
TOTAL
19.24k
20.84k (x1.08)

Multithread

3855U

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
15.12k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
11.28k
14.05k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
5.94k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
3.48k (x1.39)
TOTAL
24.56k
38.59k (x1.57)

Performance/W
3855U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
524 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
752 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
194 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
1637 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
3855U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3706 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5333 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1423 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1562 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
12024 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4