Celeron 3855U vs E Series E-350
Description
The 3855U is based on Skylake architecture while the E-350 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the 3855U is 2.5 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the 3855U is 2.5 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
500f10
Core
Skylake-U
Zacate
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
18 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
2096 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2015
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
19.24k points
6.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.56k points
10.05k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3855U
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1.64k
0.83k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
6.72k
2.38k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.06k
1.41k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
0.75k (x0.31)
TOTAL
12.83k
5.37k (x0.42)
Multithread
3855U
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
2.2k
1.45k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
9.59k
3.97k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
2.18k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.27k
0.82k (x0.36)
TOTAL
16.81k
8.42k (x0.5)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3855U
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
5.93k
1.78k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
2.33k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
1.41k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
0.74k (x0.3)
TOTAL
19.24k
6.26k (x0.33)
Multithread
3855U
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
2.84k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
11.28k
3.89k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
2.42k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
0.9k (x0.36)
TOTAL
24.56k
10.05k (x0.41)
Performance/W
3855U
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
524 points/W
158 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
752 points/W
216 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
194 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
1637 points/W
558 points/W
Performance/GHz
3855U
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
3706 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5333 points/GHz
1454 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1423 points/GHz
879 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1562 points/GHz
465 points/GHz
TOTAL
12024 points/GHz
3914 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4