Celeron 3855U vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Description
The 3855U is based on Skylake architecture while the TK-42 is based on K8.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the TK-42 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3855U is 1.9 times faster than the TK-42. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the TK-42 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3855U is 1.9 times faster than the TK-42. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
60f82
Core
Skylake-U
Tyler
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket S1g1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
20 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
2096 kB
kB
Date
December 2015
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
19.24k points
6.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.56k points
12.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3855U
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
5.93k
1.06k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
2.91k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
1.43k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
0.89k (x0.36)
TOTAL
19.24k
6.28k (x0.33)
Multithread
3855U
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
4.02k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
11.28k
5.2k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
2.68k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
1k (x0.4)
TOTAL
24.56k
12.91k (x0.53)
Performance/W
3855U
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
524 points/W
201 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
752 points/W
260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
194 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
1637 points/W
645 points/W
Performance/GHz
3855U
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
3706 points/GHz
662 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5333 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1423 points/GHz
891 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1562 points/GHz
555 points/GHz
TOTAL
12024 points/GHz
3927 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4