Celeron 3855U vs A6 9210
Description
The 3855U is based on Skylake architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3855U gets a score of 24.6 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
670f00
Core
Skylake-U
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
2096 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2015
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
19.24k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.56k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3855U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
5.93k
4.87k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
10.38k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
2.59k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
2.38k (x0.95)
TOTAL
19.24k
20.22k (x1.05)
Multithread
3855U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
7.41k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
11.28k
11.87k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
3.35k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.5k
2.6k (x1.04)
TOTAL
24.56k
25.23k (x1.03)
Performance/W
3855U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
524 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
752 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
194 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
1637 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
3855U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3706 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5333 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1423 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1562 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
12024 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4