| | | | | | |

Atom x5-Z8350 vs Pentium E5200 (M0)


Description
The x5-Z8350 is based on Airmont architecture while the E5200 (M0) is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.

Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.2 times faster than the x5-Z8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c4
10676
Core
Cherry Trail
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.44 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.72 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA592
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
2 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
February 2016
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
6.67k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.99k points
22.02k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
x5-Z8350
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
3.12k
2.88k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
6.31k (x3.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.13k
2.53k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
1.35k (x2.05)
TOTAL
6.67k
13.08k (x1.96)

Multithread

x5-Z8350

E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
8.49k
5.45k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
11.5k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
4.02k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
1.05k (x1.12)
TOTAL
17.99k
22.02k (x1.22)

Performance/W
x5-Z8350
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
4246 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2629 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1649 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
8995 points/W
339 points/W

Performance/GHz
x5-Z8350
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1812 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
655 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
382 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
3880 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4