Atom x5-Z8350 vs Xeon E5502
Description
The x5-Z8350 is based on Airmont architecture while the E5502 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.2 times faster than the x5-Z8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.2 times faster than the x5-Z8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
106a5
Core
Cherry Trail
Gainestown
Base frecuency
1.44 GHz
1.867 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.72 GHz
1.867 GHz
Socket
BGA592
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
2 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2016
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
6.67k points
11.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.99k points
22.28k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
x5-Z8350
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
3.12k
4.76k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
3.15k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.13k
1.94k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
1.45k (x2.21)
TOTAL
6.67k
11.3k (x1.69)
Multithread
x5-Z8350
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
8.49k
9.48k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
6.3k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
3.86k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
2.64k (x2.81)
TOTAL
17.99k
22.28k (x1.24)
Performance/W
x5-Z8350
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
4246 points/W
118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2629 points/W
79 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1649 points/W
48 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
8995 points/W
278 points/W
Performance/GHz
x5-Z8350
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
1812 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/GHz
1685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
655 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
382 points/GHz
779 points/GHz
TOTAL
3880 points/GHz
6051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4