| | | | | | |

Atom x5-Z8350 vs Xeon E5472


Description
The x5-Z8350 is based on Airmont architecture while the E5472 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5472 is 2.7 times faster than the x5-Z8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c4
10676
Core
Cherry Trail
Harpertown
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.44 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.72 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA592
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
2 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
February 2016
November 2007
Mean monothread perf.
6.67k points
16.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.99k points
48.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
x5-Z8350
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
0.86k
2.29k (x2.65)
Test#2 (FP)
1.39k
5.85k (x4.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.21k
2.44k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.82k
4.81k (x5.88)
TOTAL
4.28k
15.39k (x3.59)

Multithread

x5-Z8350

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
2.73k
9.06k (x3.32)
Test#2 (FP)
4.37k
23.09k (x5.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.74k
9.7k (x2.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.02k
2.53k (x2.49)
TOTAL
11.85k
44.38k (x3.74)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
x5-Z8350
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
3.12k
2.88k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
6.36k (x3.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.13k
2.55k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
4.83k (x7.35)
TOTAL
6.67k
16.62k (x2.49)

Multithread

x5-Z8350

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
8.49k
11.19k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
24.85k (x4.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
10.04k (x3.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
2.54k (x2.7)
TOTAL
17.99k
48.62k (x2.7)

Performance/W
x5-Z8350
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
4246 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2629 points/W
311 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1649 points/W
125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
8995 points/W
608 points/W

Performance/GHz
x5-Z8350
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1812 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
655 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
382 points/GHz
1610 points/GHz
TOTAL
3880 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4