| | | | | | |

Atom x5-Z8350 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400


Description
The x5-Z8350 is based on Airmont architecture while the Q8400 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the Q8400 gets 51.9 k points.

Summarizing, the Q8400 is 2.9 times faster than the x5-Z8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c4
1067a
Core
Cherry Trail
Yorkfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.44 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.72 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
BGA592
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
2 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
128+128 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2016
April 2009
Mean monothread perf.
6.67k points
14.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.99k points
51.92k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
x5-Z8350
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
0.86k
2.44k (x2.83)
Test#2 (FP)
1.39k
6.24k (x4.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.21k
2.62k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.82k
1.43k (x1.75)
TOTAL
4.28k
12.73k (x2.97)

Multithread

x5-Z8350

Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.73k
9.71k (x3.56)
Test#2 (FP)
4.37k
24.81k (x5.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.74k
10.51k (x2.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.02k
2.03k (x1.99)
TOTAL
11.85k
47.05k (x3.97)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
x5-Z8350
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.12k
3.08k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
6.8k (x3.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.13k
2.73k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
1.42k (x2.16)
TOTAL
6.67k
14.04k (x2.1)

Multithread

x5-Z8350

Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
8.49k
12.25k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
26.84k (x5.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
10.82k (x3.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
2.02k (x2.15)
TOTAL
17.99k
51.92k (x2.89)

Performance/W
x5-Z8350
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
4246 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2629 points/W
283 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1649 points/W
114 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/W
21 points/W
TOTAL
8995 points/W
547 points/W

Performance/GHz
x5-Z8350
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1812 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
655 points/GHz
1025 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
382 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
3880 points/GHz
5265 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4