Atom x5-Z8350 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Description
The x5-Z8350 is based on Airmont architecture while the Q6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 1.7 times faster than the x5-Z8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 1.7 times faster than the x5-Z8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
6fb
Core
Cherry Trail
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
1.44 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.72 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA592
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
2 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
February 2016
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
6.67k points
8.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.99k points
30.64k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
x5-Z8350
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.12k
2.78k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
2.49k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.13k
2.37k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
1.29k (x1.97)
TOTAL
6.67k
8.92k (x1.34)
Multithread
x5-Z8350
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
8.49k
10.9k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
9.79k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
9.11k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
0.84k (x0.89)
TOTAL
17.99k
30.64k (x1.7)
Performance/W
x5-Z8350
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
4246 points/W
115 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2629 points/W
103 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1649 points/W
96 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
8995 points/W
323 points/W
Performance/GHz
x5-Z8350
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1812 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
655 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
382 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
3880 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4