Atom x5-Z8350 vs Core 2 Duo T7100
Description
The x5-Z8350 is based on Airmont architecture while the T7100 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the x5-Z8350 is 1.4 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the x5-Z8350 is 1.4 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
6fd
Core
Cherry Trail
Merom
Base frecuency
1.44 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.72 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
BGA592
Socket P
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
2 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
February 2016
May 2007
Mean monothread perf.
6.67k points
7.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.99k points
12.9k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
x5-Z8350
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3.12k
2.08k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
1.86k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.13k
1.86k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
1.25k (x1.89)
TOTAL
6.67k
7.05k (x1.06)
Multithread
x5-Z8350
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
8.49k
4.16k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
3.73k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
3.73k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
1.28k (x1.37)
TOTAL
17.99k
12.9k (x0.72)
Performance/W
x5-Z8350
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
4246 points/W
119 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2629 points/W
107 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1649 points/W
106 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
8995 points/W
369 points/W
Performance/GHz
x5-Z8350
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
1812 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
655 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
382 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
3880 points/GHz
3916 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4