| | | | | | |

Atom x5-Z8350 vs Core 2 Duo E8200


Description
The x5-Z8350 is based on Airmont architecture while the E8200 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.4 times faster than the x5-Z8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c4
10676
Core
Cherry Trail
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.44 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.72 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA592
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
2 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2016
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
6.67k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.99k points
25.39k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
x5-Z8350
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
3.12k
3k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
6.62k (x3.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.13k
2.55k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
3.6k (x5.47)
TOTAL
6.67k
15.77k (x2.36)

Multithread

x5-Z8350

E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
8.49k
5.83k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
12.64k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
4.97k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
1.95k (x2.07)
TOTAL
17.99k
25.39k (x1.41)

Performance/W
x5-Z8350
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
4246 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2629 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1649 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
8995 points/W
391 points/W

Performance/GHz
x5-Z8350
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1812 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
655 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
382 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
3880 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4