Atom x5-Z8350 vs Celeron N3060
Description
Both models x5-Z8350 and N3060 are based on Airmont architecture.
Airmont is a 14nm shrink of Silvermont and it’s intended for low power CPUs such as Atoms, Celerons and Pentiums models. There are two cores: Braswell (for Pcs) and Cherry Trail (for tablets)
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the x5-Z8350 is 1.3 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Airmont is a 14nm shrink of Silvermont and it’s intended for low power CPUs such as Atoms, Celerons and Pentiums models. There are two cores: Braswell (for Pcs) and Cherry Trail (for tablets)
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the x5-Z8350 is 1.3 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
406c4
Core
Cherry Trail
Braswell
Base frecuency
1.44 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.72 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
BGA592
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
2 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
February 2016
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
6.67k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.99k points
13.36k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
x5-Z8350
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
3.12k
4.68k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
2.74k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.13k
1.83k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
0.9k (x1.37)
TOTAL
6.67k
10.15k (x1.52)
Multithread
x5-Z8350
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
8.49k
6.31k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
3.68k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
2.46k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
0.91k (x0.97)
TOTAL
17.99k
13.36k (x0.74)
Performance/W
x5-Z8350
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
4246 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2629 points/W
614 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1649 points/W
410 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
8995 points/W
2227 points/W
Performance/GHz
x5-Z8350
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1812 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/GHz
1104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
655 points/GHz
739 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
382 points/GHz
364 points/GHz
TOTAL
3880 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4