Atom x5-Z8350 vs N270
Description
The x5-Z8350 is based on Airmont architecture while the N270 is based on Bonnell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the N270 gets 4.4 k points.
Summarizing, the x5-Z8350 is 4.1 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the N270 gets 4.4 k points.
Summarizing, the x5-Z8350 is 4.1 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
106c2
Core
Cherry Trail
Diamondville
Base frecuency
1.44 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.72 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
BGA592
BGA 437
Cores/Threads
4/4
1 /2
TDP
2 W
3 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
512 kB
Date
February 2016
June 2008
Mean monothread perf.
6.67k points
3.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.99k points
4.43k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
x5-Z8350
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
0.86k
0.37k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
1.39k
0.74k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.21k
0.73k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.82k
0.44k (x0.54)
TOTAL
4.28k
2.28k (x0.53)
Multithread
x5-Z8350
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
2.73k
0.55k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
4.37k
1.26k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.74k
1.09k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.02k
0.47k (x0.46)
TOTAL
11.85k
3.37k (x0.28)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
x5-Z8350
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
3.12k
1.02k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
0.85k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.13k
0.93k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
0.37k (x0.57)
TOTAL
6.67k
3.18k (x0.48)
Multithread
x5-Z8350
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
8.49k
1.31k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
1.36k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
1.33k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
0.42k (x0.45)
TOTAL
17.99k
4.43k (x0.25)
Performance/W
x5-Z8350
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
4246 points/W
437 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2629 points/W
454 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1649 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/W
140 points/W
TOTAL
8995 points/W
1477 points/W
Performance/GHz
x5-Z8350
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
1812 points/GHz
638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/GHz
534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
655 points/GHz
580 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
382 points/GHz
234 points/GHz
TOTAL
3880 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4