Atom x5-Z8350 vs E Series E-350
Description
The x5-Z8350 is based on Airmont architecture while the E-350 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the x5-Z8350 is 1.8 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the x5-Z8350 is 1.8 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
500f10
Core
Cherry Trail
Zacate
Base frecuency
1.44 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.72 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
BGA592
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
2 W
18 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Date
February 2016
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
6.67k points
6.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.99k points
10.05k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
x5-Z8350
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
0.86k
0.83k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
1.39k
2.38k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.21k
1.41k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.82k
0.75k (x0.91)
TOTAL
4.28k
5.37k (x1.25)
Multithread
x5-Z8350
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
2.73k
1.45k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
4.37k
3.97k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.74k
2.18k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.02k
0.82k (x0.81)
TOTAL
11.85k
8.42k (x0.71)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
x5-Z8350
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
3.12k
1.78k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
2.33k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.13k
1.41k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
0.74k (x1.13)
TOTAL
6.67k
6.26k (x0.94)
Multithread
x5-Z8350
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
8.49k
2.84k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
3.89k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
2.42k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
0.9k (x0.96)
TOTAL
17.99k
10.05k (x0.56)
Performance/W
x5-Z8350
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
4246 points/W
158 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2629 points/W
216 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1649 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
8995 points/W
558 points/W
Performance/GHz
x5-Z8350
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1812 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/GHz
1454 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
655 points/GHz
879 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
382 points/GHz
465 points/GHz
TOTAL
3880 points/GHz
3914 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4