| | | | | | |

Atom x5-Z8350 vs A6 9210


Description
The x5-Z8350 is based on Airmont architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the x5-Z8350 gets a score of 18 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.4 times faster than the x5-Z8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c4
670f00
Core
Cherry Trail
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.44 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.72 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA592
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
2 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
February 2016
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
6.67k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.99k points
27.13k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
x5-Z8350
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3.12k
4.87k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
10.38k (x5.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.13k
2.59k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.66k
2.38k (x3.63)
TOTAL
6.67k
20.22k (x3.03)

Multithread

x5-Z8350

9210
Test#1 (Integers)
8.49k
7.41k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
5.26k
11.87k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
3.35k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
2.6k (x2.77)
TOTAL
17.99k
25.23k (x1.4)

Performance/W
x5-Z8350
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
4246 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2629 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1649 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
8995 points/W
1682 points/W

Performance/GHz
x5-Z8350
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1812 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
655 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
382 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
3880 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4