Atom N270 vs Core Duo T2300
Description
The N270 is based on Bonnell architecture while the T2300 is based on P6 Enhanced Pentium M.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N270 gets a score of 4.4 k points while the T2300 gets 9.4 k points.
Summarizing, the T2300 is 2.1 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N270 gets a score of 4.4 k points while the T2300 gets 9.4 k points.
Summarizing, the T2300 is 2.1 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106c2
6e8
Core
Diamondville
Yonah
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.66 GHz
Socket
BGA 437
Socket 479
Cores/Threads
1 /2
2/2
TDP
3 W
31 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
512 kB
2048 kB
Date
June 2008
January 2006
Mean monothread perf.
3.18k points
5.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
4.43k points
9.38k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N270
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.02k
1.46k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
0.85k
1.63k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.93k
1.53k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.37k
0.96k (x2.56)
TOTAL
3.18k
5.58k (x1.76)
Multithread
N270
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.31k
2.42k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
1.36k
2.95k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.33k
3k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.42k
1.01k (x2.42)
TOTAL
4.43k
9.38k (x2.12)
Performance/W
N270
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
437 points/W
78 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
454 points/W
95 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
97 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
1477 points/W
303 points/W
Performance/GHz
N270
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
638 points/GHz
882 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
534 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
580 points/GHz
924 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
234 points/GHz
578 points/GHz
TOTAL
1986 points/GHz
3364 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4