Xeon Silver 4208 vs N95
Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 3.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 3.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
b06e0
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Gracemont
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
37.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
97.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
14.82k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
10.51k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
5.45k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
6.27k (x1)
TOTAL
38.61k
37.06k (x0.96)
Multithread
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
43.01k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
32.29k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
17.36k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
4.82k (x0.56)
TOTAL
311.57k
97.48k (x0.31)
Performance/W
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
2868 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
2152 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
1157 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
322 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
6499 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
4360 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
3093 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
1604 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
1843 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
10900 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4