Xeon Silver 4208 vs N100
Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the gets 92.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 3.4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the gets 92.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 3.4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
b06e0
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
40.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
92.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
16.04k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
12.17k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
6.25k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
5.74k (x0.91)
TOTAL
38.61k
40.2k (x1.04)
Multithread
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
38k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
34.92k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
15.89k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
3.79k (x0.44)
TOTAL
311.57k
92.6k (x0.3)
Performance/W
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
6333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
5820 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
632 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
15433 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
4718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
1838 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
1687 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
11824 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4