Xeon X5365 vs N95
Description
The X5365 is based on Core architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5365 gets a score of 77.2 k points while the gets 102.4 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.3 times faster than the X5365. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5365 gets a score of 77.2 k points while the gets 102.4 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.3 times faster than the X5365. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
b06e0
Core
Clovertown
Gracemont
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 771
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
150 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x4096 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2007
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
10.5k points
39.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
77.22k points
105.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5365
Test#1 (Integers)
3.47k
12.31k (x3.55)
Test#2 (FP)
3.11k
12.13k (x3.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.99k
7.03k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
7.32k (x7.78)
TOTAL
10.5k
38.79k (x3.69)
Multithread
X5365
Test#1 (Integers)
27.34k
38.72k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
24.32k
37.18k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.8k
22.53k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.75k
3.97k (x1.45)
TOTAL
77.22k
102.41k (x1.33)
Performance/W
X5365
Test#1 (Integers)
182 points/W
2582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
162 points/W
2479 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
152 points/W
1502 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
18 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
515 points/W
6827 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5365
Test#1 (Integers)
1155 points/GHz
3621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1035 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
996 points/GHz
2068 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
314 points/GHz
2152 points/GHz
TOTAL
3500 points/GHz
11410 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4