Pentium 4 HT 520 vs E Series E-350
Description
The 520 is based on NetBurst architecture while the E-350 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 520 gets a score of 8.6 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the E-350 is 1.2 times faster than the 520. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 520 gets a score of 8.6 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the E-350 is 1.2 times faster than the 520. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f34
500f10
Core
Prescott
Zacate
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
1/2
2/2
TDP
84 W
18 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8+8 kB
kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x512 kB
Date
2004
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
7.46k points
6.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.63k points
10.05k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
520
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1.46k
0.83k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
2.6k
2.38k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.26k
1.41k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.88k
0.75k (x0.85)
TOTAL
6.19k
5.37k (x0.87)
Multithread
520
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1.19k
1.45k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
3k
3.97k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.46k
2.18k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.89k
0.82k (x0.91)
TOTAL
6.54k
8.42k (x1.29)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
520
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1.96k
1.78k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
3.12k
2.33k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.5k
1.41k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.88k
0.74k (x0.84)
TOTAL
7.46k
6.26k (x0.84)
Multithread
520
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1.77k
2.84k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
4.19k
3.89k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.77k
2.42k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.89k
0.9k (x1.01)
TOTAL
8.63k
10.05k (x1.17)
Performance/W
520
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
21 points/W
158 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
50 points/W
216 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
11 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
103 points/W
558 points/W
Performance/GHz
520
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
700 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1113 points/GHz
1454 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
535 points/GHz
879 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
315 points/GHz
465 points/GHz
TOTAL
2663 points/GHz
3914 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4