| | | | | | |

N95 vs Xeon W-2223


Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 105.6 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 2.3 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06e0
50657
Core
Gracemont
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8448 kB
Date
January 2023
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
39.5k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.57k points
243.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
3.97k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
8.58k
14.5k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
4.78k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.3k
8.19k (x1.12)
TOTAL
25.99k
31.45k (x1.21)

Multithread


W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
10.79k
15.56k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
59.23k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
22.87k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
6.85k (x1.72)
TOTAL
63.07k
104.51k (x1.66)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
15.57k
25.09k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
20.76k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
5.07k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.36k
8.76k (x1.38)
TOTAL
39.5k
59.68k (x1.51)

Multithread


W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
46.51k
111.43k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
35.31k
100.2k (x2.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.27k
24.67k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.49k
6.89k (x1.53)
TOTAL
105.57k
243.18k (x2.3)

Performance/W
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3100 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2354 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1285 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
299 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
7038 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
4579 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3382 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1783 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1872 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
11617 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4