N95 vs Xeon X5670
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.1 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.1 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
206c2
Core
Gracemont
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
6 /6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
39.5k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.57k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
12.31k
8.35k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
12.13k
5.58k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
3.32k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
3k (x0.41)
TOTAL
38.79k
20.26k (x0.52)
Multithread
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
38.72k
49.72k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
37.18k
35.19k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.53k
21.88k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
8.6k (x2.16)
TOTAL
102.41k
115.4k (x1.13)
Performance/W
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2479 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1502 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
6827 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3621 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3568 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2068 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2152 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
11410 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4