N95 vs Xeon X5365
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the X5365 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the X5365 gets 77.2 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.3 times faster than the X5365. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the X5365 gets 77.2 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.3 times faster than the X5365. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
6fb
Core
Gracemont
Clovertown
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
LGA 771
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
150 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x4096 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2023
August 2007
Mean monothread perf.
39.5k points
10.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.57k points
77.22k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5365
Test#1 (Integers)
12.31k
3.47k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
12.13k
3.11k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
2.99k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
0.94k (x0.13)
TOTAL
38.79k
10.5k (x0.27)
Multithread
X5365
Test#1 (Integers)
38.72k
27.34k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
37.18k
24.32k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.53k
22.8k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
2.75k (x0.69)
TOTAL
102.41k
77.22k (x0.75)
Performance/W
X5365
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/W
182 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2479 points/W
162 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1502 points/W
152 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
6827 points/W
515 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5365
Test#1 (Integers)
3621 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3568 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2068 points/GHz
996 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2152 points/GHz
314 points/GHz
TOTAL
11410 points/GHz
3500 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4