N95 vs N150
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the is based on Gracemont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 97.5 k points while the gets 112.7 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 97.5 k points while the gets 112.7 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
b06e0
Core
Gracemont
Twin Lake
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2025
Mean monothread perf.
37.06k points
36.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.48k points
112.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Test#1 (Integers)
14.82k
14.42k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
11.18k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
5.68k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
5.25k (x0.84)
TOTAL
37.06k
36.54k (x0.99)
Multithread
Test#1 (Integers)
43.01k
50.39k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
32.29k
37.69k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.36k
20.09k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.82k
4.53k (x0.94)
TOTAL
97.48k
112.69k (x1.16)
Performance/W
Test#1 (Integers)
2868 points/W
8398 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2152 points/W
6282 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/W
3348 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
755 points/W
TOTAL
6499 points/W
18782 points/W
Performance/GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
4360 points/GHz
4006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3093 points/GHz
3106 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1604 points/GHz
1579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1843 points/GHz
1459 points/GHz
TOTAL
10900 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4