N95 vs N150
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the is based on Gracemont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 105.6 k points while the gets 98.9 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.1 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 105.6 k points while the gets 98.9 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.1 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
b06e0
Core
Gracemont
Twin Lake
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2025
Mean monothread perf.
39.5k points
34.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.57k points
98.93k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Test#1 (Integers)
15.57k
13.85k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
10.38k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
5k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.36k
5.51k (x0.87)
TOTAL
39.5k
34.73k (x0.88)
Multithread
Test#1 (Integers)
46.51k
41.86k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
35.31k
35.28k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.27k
16.55k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.49k
5.24k (x1.17)
TOTAL
105.57k
98.93k (x0.94)
Performance/W
Test#1 (Integers)
3100 points/W
6977 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2354 points/W
5879 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1285 points/W
2758 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
299 points/W
873 points/W
TOTAL
7038 points/W
16488 points/W
Performance/GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
4579 points/GHz
3847 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3382 points/GHz
2883 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1783 points/GHz
1388 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1872 points/GHz
1530 points/GHz
TOTAL
11617 points/GHz
9649 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4