N95 vs Celeron N5095
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.1 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.1 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
906c0
Core
Gracemont
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
39.5k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.57k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
12.31k
10.08k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
12.13k
10.11k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
4.06k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
2.36k (x0.32)
TOTAL
38.79k
26.6k (x0.69)
Multithread
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
38.72k
36.86k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
37.18k
38.51k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.53k
15.17k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
2.72k (x0.68)
TOTAL
102.41k
93.26k (x0.91)
Performance/W
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2479 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1502 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
6827 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
3621 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3568 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2068 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2152 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
11410 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4