N95 vs Celeron G3900TE
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the is 2.1 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the is 2.1 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
506e3
Core
Gracemont
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2023
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
39.5k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.57k points
49.34k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
2.36k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
8.58k
9.79k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
3.08k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.3k
3.36k (x0.46)
TOTAL
25.99k
18.59k (x0.72)
Multithread
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
10.79k
4.45k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
18.16k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
5.48k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
3.5k (x0.88)
TOTAL
63.07k
31.59k (x0.5)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
12.31k
8.56k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
12.13k
12.25k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
3.17k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
3.35k (x0.46)
TOTAL
38.79k
27.33k (x0.7)
Multithread
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
38.72k
16.42k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
37.18k
23.61k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.53k
5.75k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
3.55k (x0.89)
TOTAL
102.41k
49.34k (x0.48)
Performance/W
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2479 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1502 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
6827 points/W
1410 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3621 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3568 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2068 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2152 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
11410 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4