N95 vs Engineering Sample 906ED 2.1GHz
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 906ED 2.1GHz is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 105.6 k points while the 906ED 2.1GHz gets 657.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906ED 2.1GHz is 6.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 105.6 k points while the 906ED 2.1GHz gets 657.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906ED 2.1GHz is 6.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
906ed
Core
Gracemont
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
39.5k points
86.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.57k points
657.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
5.2k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
8.58k
21.19k (x2.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
6.85k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.3k
15.48k (x2.12)
TOTAL
25.99k
48.71k (x1.87)
Multithread
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
10.79k
42.31k (x3.92)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
198.07k (x7.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
68.37k (x3.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
7.38k (x1.85)
TOTAL
63.07k
316.12k (x5.01)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
12.31k
18.76k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
12.13k
27.15k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
7.15k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
15.31k (x2.09)
TOTAL
38.79k
68.37k (x1.76)
Multithread
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
38.72k
156.95k (x4.05)
Test#2 (FP)
37.18k
250.7k (x6.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.53k
70.02k (x3.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
7.43k (x1.87)
TOTAL
102.41k
485.11k (x4.74)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
12.31k
18.88k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
12.77k
28.5k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
6.91k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.25k
14.86k (x2.05)
TOTAL
39.36k
69.14k (x1.76)
Multithread
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
38.91k
157.47k (x4.05)
Test#2 (FP)
39.28k
265.75k (x6.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.49k
68.86k (x3.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
7.38k (x1.85)
TOTAL
104.66k
499.47k (x4.77)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
15.57k
33.92k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
30k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
7.01k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.36k
15.73k (x2.47)
TOTAL
39.5k
86.65k (x2.19)
Multithread
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
46.51k
302.78k (x6.51)
Test#2 (FP)
35.31k
278.98k (x7.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.27k
67.89k (x3.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.49k
7.53k (x1.68)
TOTAL
105.57k
657.19k (x6.22)
Performance/W
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
3100 points/W