N95 vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5800HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 105.6 k points while the 5800HS gets 462.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800HS is 4.4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 105.6 k points while the 5800HS gets 462.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800HS is 4.4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
a50f00
Core
Gracemont
Cezanne
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
FP6
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
39.5k points
73.89k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.57k points
462.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
15.57k
15.43k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
24.54k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
10.88k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.36k
23.04k (x3.62)
TOTAL
39.5k
73.89k (x1.87)
Multithread
5800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
46.51k
154.38k (x3.32)
Test#2 (FP)
35.31k
211.82k (x6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.27k
90.2k (x4.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.49k
5.73k (x1.28)
TOTAL
105.57k
462.14k (x4.38)
Performance/W
5800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3100 points/W
4411 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2354 points/W
6052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1285 points/W
2577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
299 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
7038 points/W
13204 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4579 points/GHz
3506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3382 points/GHz
5577 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1783 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1872 points/GHz
5237 points/GHz
TOTAL
11617 points/GHz
16792 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4