| | | | | | |

N95 vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition


Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 114.2 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 2.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06e0
860f01
Core
Gracemont
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
42.41k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
114.15k points
327.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
15.92k
15.5k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
12.43k
22.96k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.52k
8.78k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
8.5k (x1.13)
TOTAL
42.41k
55.74k (x1.31)

Multithread


4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
50.11k
110.78k (x2.21)
Test#2 (FP)
37.68k
149.38k (x3.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.02k
60.88k (x2.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.34k
6.68k (x1.25)
TOTAL
114.15k
327.72k (x2.87)

Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3340 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1401 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
7610 points/W
21848 points/W

Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
4683 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3656 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2217 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
12472 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4