N95 vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 105.6 k points while the 4600H gets 335.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 3.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 105.6 k points while the 4600H gets 335.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 3.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
860f01
Core
Gracemont
Renoir
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
39.5k points
54.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.57k points
335.67k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.57k
15.48k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
23.04k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
8.66k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.36k
7.41k (x1.16)
TOTAL
39.5k
54.58k (x1.38)
Multithread
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
46.51k
117.79k (x2.53)
Test#2 (FP)
35.31k
146.49k (x4.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.27k
65.46k (x3.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.49k
5.93k (x1.32)
TOTAL
105.57k
335.67k (x3.18)
Performance/W
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3100 points/W
2618 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2354 points/W
3255 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1285 points/W
1455 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
299 points/W
132 points/W
TOTAL
7038 points/W
7459 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
4579 points/GHz
3869 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3382 points/GHz
5759 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1783 points/GHz
2165 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1872 points/GHz
1853 points/GHz
TOTAL
11617 points/GHz
13646 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4