N95 vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 114.2 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 2.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 114.2 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 2.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
860f01
Core
Gracemont
Renoir
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
42.41k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
114.15k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.92k
15.48k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
12.43k
22.82k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.52k
8.63k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
7.17k (x0.95)
TOTAL
42.41k
54.11k (x1.28)
Multithread
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.11k
117.98k (x2.35)
Test#2 (FP)
37.68k
146.43k (x3.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.02k
65.54k (x3.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.34k
4.77k (x0.89)
TOTAL
114.15k
334.72k (x2.93)
Performance/W
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3340 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1401 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
7610 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
4683 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3656 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2217 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
12472 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4