N95 vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.3 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.3 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
100fa0
Core
Gracemont
Thuban
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
AM3
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x64+6x64 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2023
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
39.5k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.57k points
80.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
1.98k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
8.58k
4.57k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
2.57k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.3k
3.51k (x0.48)
TOTAL
25.99k
12.64k (x0.49)
Multithread
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.79k
11.86k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
27.4k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
15.39k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
3.46k (x0.87)
TOTAL
63.07k
58.11k (x0.92)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.31k
5.17k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
12.13k
5.33k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
2.76k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
3.51k (x0.48)
TOTAL
38.79k
16.77k (x0.43)
Multithread
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
38.72k
29.82k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
37.18k
30.79k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.53k
15.88k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
3.69k (x0.93)
TOTAL
102.41k
80.19k (x0.78)
Performance/W
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2479 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1502 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
6827 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3621 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3568 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2068 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2152 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
11410 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4