N150 vs N95
Description
The is based on Gracemont architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 112.7 k points while the gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 112.7 k points while the gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
b06e0
Core
Twin Lake
Gracemont
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2025
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
36.54k points
37.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.69k points
97.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Test#1 (Integers)
14.42k
14.82k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
11.18k
10.51k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.68k
5.45k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
6.27k (x1.19)
TOTAL
36.54k
37.06k (x1.01)
Multithread
Test#1 (Integers)
50.39k
43.01k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
37.69k
32.29k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.09k
17.36k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
4.82k (x1.07)
TOTAL
112.69k
97.48k (x0.87)
Performance/W
Test#1 (Integers)
8398 points/W
2868 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6282 points/W
2152 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3348 points/W
1157 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
755 points/W
322 points/W
TOTAL
18782 points/W
6499 points/W
Performance/GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
4006 points/GHz
4360 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3106 points/GHz
3093 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579 points/GHz
1604 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1459 points/GHz
1843 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
10900 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4