| | | | | | |

N150 vs Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition


Description
The is based on Gracemont architecture while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 112.7 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is 1.5 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06e0
810f81
Core
Twin Lake
Picasso
Architecture
Gracemont
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2025
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.54k points
45.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.69k points
174.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
14.42k
13.77k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
11.18k
22.62k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.68k
4.91k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
4k (x0.76)
TOTAL
36.54k
45.3k (x1.24)

Multithread


3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
50.39k
50.44k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
37.69k
94k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.09k
25.64k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
4.11k (x0.91)
TOTAL
112.69k
174.19k (x1.55)

Performance/W
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
8398 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6282 points/W
6267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3348 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
755 points/W
274 points/W
TOTAL
18782 points/W
11613 points/W

Performance/GHz
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
4006 points/GHz
3722 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3106 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1459 points/GHz
1082 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
12243 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4