N150 vs Ryzen 5 7520U
Description
The is based on Gracemont architecture while the 7520U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 112.7 k points while the 7520U gets 165.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 7520U is 1.5 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 112.7 k points while the 7520U gets 165.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 7520U is 1.5 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
8a0f00
Core
Twin Lake
Mendocino
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA FT6
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2025
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
36.54k points
40.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.69k points
165.71k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.42k
15.47k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
11.18k
12.38k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.68k
7.81k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
5.33k (x1.01)
TOTAL
36.54k
40.99k (x1.12)
Multithread
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.39k
72.3k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
37.69k
51.23k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.09k
37.33k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
4.85k (x1.07)
TOTAL
112.69k
165.71k (x1.47)
Performance/W
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
8398 points/W
4820 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6282 points/W
3415 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3348 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
755 points/W
323 points/W
TOTAL
18782 points/W
11047 points/W
Performance/GHz
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
4006 points/GHz
3597 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3106 points/GHz
2880 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579 points/GHz
1817 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1459 points/GHz
1238 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
9532 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4