N150 vs Athlon 3000G
Description
The is based on Gracemont architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 112.7 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 112.7 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.2 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
810f81
Core
Twin Lake
Picasso
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2025
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.54k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.69k points
95.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.42k
13.02k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
11.18k
20.56k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.68k
4.81k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
5.43k (x1.03)
TOTAL
36.54k
43.82k (x1.2)
Multithread
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
50.39k
27.29k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
37.69k
49.37k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.09k
13.57k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
5.61k (x1.24)
TOTAL
112.69k
95.84k (x0.85)
Performance/W
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
8398 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6282 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3348 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
755 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
18782 points/W
2738 points/W
Performance/GHz
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
4006 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3106 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1459 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4