N100 vs Xeon w3-2423
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the w3-2423 is based on Sapphire Rapids.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 92.6 k points while the w3-2423 gets 254.3 k points.
Summarizing, the w3-2423 is 2.7 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 92.6 k points while the w3-2423 gets 254.3 k points.
Summarizing, the w3-2423 is 2.7 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
806f8
Core
Alder Lake-N
Sapphire Rapids-64L
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
LGA 4677
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
6 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
6x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
15360 kB
Date
January 2023
February 2023
Mean monothread perf.
40.2k points
46.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.6k points
254.28k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
w3-2423
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
21.46k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
12.17k
12.28k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.25k
6.33k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.74k
6.9k (x1.2)
TOTAL
40.2k
46.97k (x1.17)
Multithread
w3-2423
Test#1 (Integers)
38k
97.83k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
34.92k
100.83k (x2.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.89k
46.56k (x2.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
9.06k (x2.39)
TOTAL
92.6k
254.28k (x2.75)
Performance/W
w3-2423
Test#1 (Integers)
6333 points/W
815 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5820 points/W
840 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2649 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
632 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
15433 points/W
2119 points/W
Performance/GHz
w3-2423
Test#1 (Integers)
4718 points/GHz
5109 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3580 points/GHz
2923 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1838 points/GHz
1507 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1687 points/GHz
1643 points/GHz
TOTAL
11824 points/GHz
11183 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4