N100 vs Core i3-N305
Description
Both models and i3-N305 are based on Alder Lake architecture.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 92.6 k points while the i3-N305 gets 226.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-N305 is 2.4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 92.6 k points while the i3-N305 gets 226.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-N305 is 2.4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
b06e0
Core
Alder Lake-N
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
40.2k points
45.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.6k points
226.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-N305
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
18.17k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
12.17k
13.93k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.25k
7.23k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.74k
5.72k (x1)
TOTAL
40.2k
45.05k (x1.12)
Multithread
i3-N305
Test#1 (Integers)
38k
111.28k (x2.93)
Test#2 (FP)
34.92k
77.37k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.89k
35.13k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
2.9k (x0.77)
TOTAL
92.6k
226.69k (x2.45)
Performance/W
i3-N305
Test#1 (Integers)
6333 points/W
7419 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5820 points/W
5158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2649 points/W
2342 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
632 points/W
194 points/W
TOTAL
15433 points/W
15112 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-N305
Test#1 (Integers)
4718 points/GHz
4783 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3580 points/GHz
3667 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1838 points/GHz
1903 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1687 points/GHz
1504 points/GHz
TOTAL
11824 points/GHz
11856 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4