| | | | | | |

N100 vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition


Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 92.6 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 3.5 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06e0
860f01
Core
Alder Lake-N
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
40.2k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.6k points
327.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
15.5k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
12.17k
22.96k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.25k
8.78k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.74k
8.5k (x1.48)
TOTAL
40.2k
55.74k (x1.39)

Multithread


4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
38k
110.78k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
34.92k
149.38k (x4.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.89k
60.88k (x3.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
6.68k (x1.76)
TOTAL
92.6k
327.72k (x3.54)

Performance/W
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
6333 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5820 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2649 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
632 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
15433 points/W
21848 points/W

Performance/GHz
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
4718 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3580 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1838 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1687 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
11824 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4