N100 vs Ryzen 3 7320U
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7320U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 92.6 k points while the 7320U gets 126.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7320U is 1.4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 92.6 k points while the 7320U gets 126.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7320U is 1.4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
8a0f00
Core
Alder Lake-N
Mendocino
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA-FT6
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
40.2k points
32k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.6k points
126.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7320U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
13.15k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
12.17k
10.58k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.25k
6.33k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.74k
1.94k (x0.34)
TOTAL
40.2k
32k (x0.8)
Multithread
7320U
Test#1 (Integers)
38k
59.68k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
34.92k
41.08k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.89k
23.61k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
2.21k (x0.58)
TOTAL
92.6k
126.58k (x1.37)
Performance/W
7320U
Test#1 (Integers)
6333 points/W
3979 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5820 points/W
2738 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2649 points/W
1574 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
632 points/W
147 points/W
TOTAL
15433 points/W
8439 points/W
Performance/GHz
7320U
Test#1 (Integers)
4718 points/GHz
3207 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3580 points/GHz
2581 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1838 points/GHz
1544 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1687 points/GHz
472 points/GHz
TOTAL
11824 points/GHz
7804 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4